Column Performance Comparison  Guide

 C18 Reversed Phase HPLC Columns comparison Guide Independently Tested at The University of Aberdeen, UK

An Independent Comparison of Leading C18 Column Brands gave the following conclusion:

Significant differences in efficiency, peak shape and selectivity are seen with C18 bonded columns when evaluating acidic and basic compounds. These variations are caused by undesirable secondary silanol interactions. The selection of a high efficiency base deactivated phase with very low silanol activity will prove highly beneficial for the majority of  analyses.
Professional chromatographers chose their columns based on hard technical facts. Below you find comparison data on commonly used C18 phases.

It includes

  • Stationary phase specifications
  • Phases compared according to relative hydrophobicity
  • Comparison of column efficiency for a neutral compound
  • Phases compared according to metal activity
  • Phases grouped according to silanol activity
  • Comparison of column efficiency for basic compounds
  • Categorisation of phases according to silanol activity and inertness
  •  

Comparison Guide2 small
Comparison Guide3small
Comparison Guide4 small
Comparison Guide5 small
Comparison Guide6small
Comparison Guide7small
Comparison Guide8small
Comparison Guide9small
Comparison Guide10small
Comparison Guide11small
Comparison Guide12small
[Chromatographyhop] [Whats New?] [Customer Support] [Expert Training] [Networking] [LC Product Supplier] [GC Product Supplier] [Workimprovment] [Equipment] [Column Technology.] [USP Specification] [Prep/Process Col] [Flash Cartrides] [Analyt Columns] [Medium Bore Col.] [Microbore Col] [Capillary/Nano Col] [LC-MC Columns] [Rapid Analysis Col] [Sub 3 um Phases] [Combi-Chem Col] [Method Dev. Kits] [Guard Cartridges] [Flushing Columns] [Column Comparison] [Phases] [Processes] [Contacting us] [Terms & Conditions]

The chromatographyshop web-site is Copyright protected by  LCC Engineering & Trading GmbH 1995 - 2010